This week’s journal articles focus on transformational leadership and knowledge and knowledge sharing within an organization, please review these concepts and answer the following questions:
How do trustworthy and ethical leaders enhance knowledge sharing in organizations? How does this impact the rate of information technology implementations? How does this impact data management within organizations?
How does servant leadership assist with transferring knowledge in an organization?
When thinking about data analytics, how does transformational leadership assist with building good data structures?
Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the last five years.
The paper should meet the following requirements:
3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references)
APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a cover page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.
The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes the quality of writing.
School of Computer and Information Sciences
COURSE SYLLABUS
Course Information
ITS630 – A01 Organ Leader & Decision Making
Fall 2020 First Bi-Term
Course Format: Online
CRN: 11684
Instructor Information
Name: Dr. Mamdouh Babi
Email: mamdouh.babi@ucumberlands.edu
Phone: 440-525-1936
Office Location: FL
Office Hours/Preferred Contact Times: By Appointment
Course Description
One of the most important skills a business leader needs to have concerning technology
involves effective decision making and governance. This class will consist of a case study
approach presenting different scenarios that require decisions to be made on technology
issues that are relevant to today�s business environment. Students will develop the skills
for understanding the components and elements of these technology decisions, and
assess associated risks. This course will draw upon a cross section of technology, finance,
security, project management, leadership, and other aspects of effective decision making.
Course Objectives
Upon completion of this course:
1. Develop IT strategy for business value,
2. – Explain the principles of business metrics and its application in the business
setting,
3. – Explore and explain the principles of communications with business managers.
Learner Outcomes
Compare and contrast the difference between leadership and management in a
digital world
Understand how innovation assists organizations with transformation principles and
practices
Understand how organizational culture impacts productivity
Articulate what ethical leadership is and how it impacts culture
Evaluate leadership traits that are most influential and impactful in strategic
business decisions.
Course Website
Access to the course website is required via the iLearn portal on the University of the
Cumberlands website: http://www.ucumberlands.edu/ilearn/
or https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/
Required Books and Resources
Title: IT Strategy: Issues and practices
Authors: McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.
Publisher: Pearson
Publication Date: 2015
Edition: Third Edition
Course Required text can be found and purchased via the UC Barnes and Noble Bookstore:
https://cumber.bncollege.com/shop/cumberlands/page/find-textbooks
Suggested Books and Resources
http://www.schoolcounselor.org/
Organizational Ethics
ISBN: 9781506361765
Authors: Craig E. Johnson
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Publication Date: 2018-01-31
Building Leadership Character
ISBN: 9781544343112
Authors: Amy Newman
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Publication Date: 2018-03-28
Organizational Leadership
ISBN: 9781529715460
Authors: John Bratton
Publisher: SAGE
Publication Date: 2020-02-10
Edition: 1st ED.
Requirements and Policies
Academic Integrity/Plagiarism
At a Christian liberal arts university committed to the pursuit of truth and understanding,
any act of academic dishonesty is especially distressing and cannot be tolerated. In
general, academic dishonesty involves the abuse and misuse of information or people to
gain an undeserved academic advantage or evaluation. The common forms of academic
dishonesty include:
Cheating – using deception in the taking of tests or the preparation of written work,
using unauthorized materials, copying another person’s work with or without
consent, or assisting another in such activities.
Lying – falsifying, fabricating, or forging information in either written, spoken, or
video presentations.
Plagiarism—using the published writings, data, interpretations, or ideas of another
without proper documentation
Plagiarism includes copying and pasting material from the internet into
assignments without properly citing the source of the material.
Episodes of academic dishonesty are reported to the Vice President for Academic Affairs.
The potential penalty for academic dishonesty includes a failing grade on a particular
assignment, a failing grade for the entire course, or charges against the student with the
appropriate disciplinary body.
Attendance Policy
Course enrollment and participation will be monitored and verified for all students during
the first two weeks of classes. Lack of participation during this time may jeopardize
enrollment status. Each student is expected to meet course expectations by completing
the coursework required each week. Active participation and staying abreast of the
material is essential to success. Program specific attendance policies may still apply.
Participation Policy:
Study after study has linked successful academic performance with good class
participation. Those who assume positions of responsibility must “show up” in order to be
effective. Therefore, students are expected to actively participate in intelligent discussion
of assigned topics in all areas (Discussion Board Activities, Synchronous Sessions, Forums,
Shared Papers, etc.) to help process course material and/or to demonstrate understanding
of course content. Point adjustments will be taken for non-participation.
Disability Accommodations
University of the Cumberlands accepts students with certified disabilities and provides
reasonable accommodations for their certified needs in the classroom, in housing, in food
service or in other areas. For accommodations to be awarded, a student must submit a
completed Accommodations Application form and provide documentation of the disability
to the Disability Services Coordinator (Mr. Jacob Ratliff, Boswell Campus Center, Student
Services Office Suite, jacob.ratliff@ucumberlands.edu). When all paperwork is on file, a
meeting between the student and the Coordinator will be arranged to discuss possible
accommodations before accommodations are formally approved. Students must then meet
with the Coordinator at the beginning of each semester before any academic
accommodations can be certified for that term. Certifications for other accommodations
are normally reviewed annually.
Academic Appeal
Both undergraduate and graduate students have the right to challenge a grade. If
discussions with the course instructor and department chair do not lead to a satisfactory
conclusion, students may file a formal written appeal with the Vice President for Academic
Affairs, who will forward the appeal to the chair of the Academic Appeals Committee. This
formal written appeal must be filed by the end of the 4th week of classes in the next
regular term following the term in which the course in question was taken. The Academic
Appeals Committee then gathers information from the student, the instructor, and any
other relevant parties. The Committee will deliver its recommendation on the complaint to
the Vice President for Academic Affairs. After reviewing this recommendation and
concurring or amending it, the Vice President for Academic Affairs will inform the student
and instructor of the disposition of the complaint no later than the last day of classes of
the term in which the complaint was filed. Records of all actions regarding academic grade
appeals, including their final disposition, are maintained by the Vice President for
Academic Affairs and the Academic Appeals Committee. (Undergraduate Catalog/Graduate
Catalog)
Student Responsibilities
Students should:
Use University of the Cumberlands email system for all academic, administrative,
and co-curricular communication between faculty, staff and peers.
Check for email and class announcements using iLearn (primary) and University of
the Cumberlands webmail (secondary) daily.
Demonstrate Cumberlands Character in and outside the classroom per the University
Mission & Vision
Ensure you have consistent required technology for the course
Participate in courses regularly to:
Find announcements and updates
Complete assignments on time. Keep in mind that all deadlines use Eastern
Standard Time (EST).
Engage in discussion
Connect with fellow students and faculty
Present written work in an academic and professional manner.
Take examinations on the designated dates and times. Students should make
arrangements with faculty before the designated date for any needed
accommodations.
Contact faculty or student success coordinator with questions or concerns.
Course Policies
The only authorized electronic means of academic, administrative, and co-curricular
communication between University of the Cumberlands and its students is through
the UCumberlands email system (i.e. Webmail). Each student is responsible for
monitoring his/her University email account frequently. This is the primary email
account used to correspond with you directly by the University; imperative program
information is sent to this email account specifically from campus and program
office.
Students should check for e-mail and class announcements using iLearn (primary)
and University of the Cumberlands webmail (secondary).
Students are expected to find out class assignments for missed classes and make up
missed work.
Students are expected to find out if any changes have been made in the class or
assignment schedule.
Written work must be presented in a professional manner. Work that is not
submitted in a professional manner will not be evaluated and will be returned as
unacceptable.
There is a craft to writing. Spelling, grammar, punctuation and diction (word
usage) are all tools of that craft. Writing at the collegiate level will show careful
attention to these elements of craft. Work that does not exhibit care with
regard to these elements will be considered as inadequate for college writing
and graded accordingly.
Students are expected to take the examinations on the designated dates. If you are
unable to take the exam on the scheduled date and know in advance, you are to
make arrangements with your professor before the designated date. If you miss the
exam, you must have a legitimate reason as determined by your professor.
Recognizing that a large part of professional life is meeting deadlines, it is necessary to
develop time management and organizational skills. Failure to meet the course deadlines
may result in penalties. Keep in mind that all deadlines are set using Eastern Standard
Time (EST). Late assignments will NOT be accepted.
Course Activities and Experiences
Students are expected to:
• Review any assigned reading material and prepare responses to homework assigned.
• Actively participate in activities, assignments, and discussions.
• Evaluate and react to each other’s work in a supportive, constructive manner.
• Complete specific assignments and exams when specified and in a professional manner.
• Utilize learned technologies for class assignments.
• Connect content knowledge from core courses to practical training placement and
activities.
Links to Support
UC Academic Catalog: https://www.ucumberlands.edu/academics/academic-catalog
UC Student Handbook: https://www.ucumberlands.edu/student-handbook
Academic Resources & Writing Center: www.ucumberlands.edu/learningcommons
Library: http://www.ucumberlands.edu/library/
Bookstore: https://cumber.bncollege.com/shop/cumberlands/home
About University of the Cumberlands:
https://www.ucumberlands.edu/about/presidents-welcome
Course Evaluation
A student will be evaluated/weighted on the following basis:
Course Weekly Participation (Discussions): 10% Course Grade
Course Weekly Assignments (Case Studies): 20% Course Grade
Portfolio Project: 20% Course Grade
Policies (Acceptance of Course Policies): 5% Course Grade
STP (Create a Strategic Plan): 5% Course Grade
MidTerm Exam: 20% Course Grade
Final Exam: 20% Course Grade
Grading Scale
Graded work will receive a numeric score reflecting the quality of performance as given
above in evaluation methods. The overall course grade will be determined according to the
following scale:
A= 900 – 1000 (90% – 100%)
B= 800 – 899 (80% – 89%)
C = 700 – 799 (70% – 79%)
F < 699 (Below 69%)
Course Schedule
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Lesson 1:Leadership vs. Management and How Leadership Impacts Decisions in the Digital
Space
Resources Required Reading:
Read Chapters 1, 2, and 3 in text
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
Read Chapter 1 in the text
Read Benbya, H., Ning Nan, Tanriverdi, H., & Youngjin Yoo. (2020).
Complexity and Information Systems Research in the Emerging
Digital World. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/13304
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=buh&AN=141995164&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Optional Resources:
Read: Chapter 1 Journal articles
Journal Article 1.1:Trumpy, A.J. and Elliott, M. (2019) ‘You
lead like a girl: Gender and children’s leadership
development’, Sociological Perspectives, 62(3): 346–365.
Journal Article 1.2:Sudha, K.S., Shahnawaz, M. G. and
Farhat, A. (2016) ‘Leadership styles, leader’s effectiveness
and well-being: Exploring Collective Efficacy as a Mediator’,
Vision, 20(2): 111–120.
View: Chapter 1 Videos
Chapter 1: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-1-the-nature-of-leadership
0 points
Discussion After completing the reading this week, please review table 1.2 in
the text and review the distinction between leadership and
25 points
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
management. Then think about this in regard to how senior
leaders versus senior managers lead change in an organization
(especially when it comes to technical change in an organization).
This week please reflect on these concepts and answer the
following questions:
1. When implementing change in an organization, there are
always culture issues that are faced, such as not accepting
change, determine how differently this would be handled
thinking about the management versus leadership
constructs?
2. When dealing with performing work, how is this
implemented differently within the management versus
leadership constructs?
Please be sure to answer all of the questions above in the initial
post.
Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are
substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the
following:
· Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
· Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful information
· Answer a question posted by another student in detail
· Share an applicable personal experience
· Provide an outside source
· Make an argument
At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in
the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information
from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use
APA references and in-text citations.
Please be sure to engage by Wednesday at 11:59pm ET and then
engage on two more days throughout the week (for a total of
Initial post
due by
Thursday
Aug. 27,
2020. Two
or more
peers with
substantive
responses
by Sunday,
Aug. 30,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
three days of engagement, before Sunday at 11:59pm, ET).
Note: This discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is worth
twenty-five (25) points. You are required to respond to the
question in order to obtain credit for the assignment by the due
date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you
will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading
criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be
compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You
will be able to review every other submission once you complete
your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses
will not be tolerated.
Written
Work
This week’s journal article was focused on the Complexity of
Information Systems Research in the Digital World. Complexity is
increasing as new technologies are emerging every day. This
complexity impacts human experiences. Organizations are
turning to digitally enabled solutions to assist with the emergence
of digitalization.
Please review the article and define the various technologies that
are emerging as noted in the article. Note how these emerging
technologies are impacting organizations and what organizations
can to do to reduce the burden of digitalization.
Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google
Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that
journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the
last five years.
The paper should meet the following requirements:
3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references)
APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a cover
page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a
conclusion.
A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.
100 points
Due by
Sunday
Aug. 30,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Policies
(Acceptance
of Course
Policies)
The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used
to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes
the quality of writing.
Note: This written assignment is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is
worth one-hundred (100) points. You are required to answer the
questions as stated in the assignment question in order to obtain
credit for the assignment by the due date. If you do not complete
the assignment by the due date, you will receive a zero (0) for
this assignment. There is a grading criterion associated with this
assignment. Your work will be compared to other’s work, using
SafeAssign for plagiarism, so please note that copying other
people’s responses will not be tolerated.
Policies (Acceptance of Course Policies)
5 points
Due by
Sunday
Aug. 30,
2020
Lesson 2:Organizational Performance, Innovation, and the TAM Methodology
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Resources Required Reading:
Read Chapters 4, 5, and 6 in text
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
Read Chapter 2 in the text
Read AKCIL, U., ALTINAY, Z., DAGLI, G., & ALTINAY, F. (2019). The
Role of Technology Leadership: Innovation for School Leadership
in Digital Age. ELearning & Software for Education, 2, 323.
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=edb&AN=135939718&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Optional Resources:
Read: Chapter 2 Journal articles
Journal Article 2.1:Learmonth, M. and Morrell, K. (2017)
‘Is critical leadership studies ‘critical’?’ Leadership, 13(3):
257–271.
Journal Article 2.2:Spector, B.A. (2016) ‘Carlyle, Freud,
and the great man theory more fully considered’,
Leadership, 12(2): 250–260.
View: Chapter 2 Videos
Chapter 2: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-2-strategic-management-
innovation-and-leadership-part-1
0 points
Discussion After completing the reading this week, we reflect on a few key
concepts this week:
1. Organizational performance is the fifth aspect of the model,
reflect on the question, do certain leadership behaviors
improve and sustain performance at the individual, group,
and organizational level? Please explain your response.
2. There were two types of innovation addressed this week
(product and process innovation), please note your own
25 points
Initial post
due by
Thursday
Sep. 03,
2020. Two
or more
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
personal definition of these concepts and offer an example
of both.
Please be sure to answer all of the questions above in the initial
post.
Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are
substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the
following:
· Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
· Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful information
· Answer a question posted by another student in detail
· Share an applicable personal experience
· Provide an outside source
· Make an argument
At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in
the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information
from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use
APA references and in-text citations.
Please be sure to engage by Wednesday at 11:59pm ET and then
engage on two more days throughout the week (for a total of
three days of engagement, before Sunday at 11:59pm, ET
Note: This discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is worth
twenty-five (25) points. You are required to respond to the
question in order to obtain credit for the assignment by the due
date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you
will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading
criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be
compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You
will be able to review every other submission once you complete
peers with
substantive
responses
by Sunday,
Sep. 06,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses
will not be tolerated.
Written
Work
This week’s journal article was focused on how information and
communication innovation drives change in educational settings.
The key focus of the article was how technology-based leadership
has driven the digital age. Also, that the role of technology
leadership incorporates with the Technology Acceptance Model
(TAM).
In this paper, address the following key concepts:
1. Define TAM and the components.
2. Note how TAM is impacting educational settings.
3. Give an overview of the case study presented and the
findings.
Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google
Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that
journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the
last five years.
The paper should meet the following requirements:
· 3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references)
· APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a
cover page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content,
and a conclusion.
· A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.
The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used
to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes
the quality of writing.
Note: This written assignment is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is
worth one-hundred (100) points. You are required to answer the
questions as stated in the assignment question in order to obtain
100 points
Due by
Sunday,
Sep. 06,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
STP –
Strategic
Technology
Plan
credit for the assignment by the due date. If you do not complete
the assignment by the due date, you will receive a zero (0) for
this assignment. There is a grading criterion associated with this
assignment. Your work will be compared to other’s work, using
SafeAssign for plagiarism, so please note that copying other
people’s responses will not be tolerated.
STP – Strategic Technology Plan
100 points
Due by
Sunday,
Sep. 06,
2020
Lesson 3: Power in Leadership, Organizational Leadership and Intentionality in Innovation
Implementations
Resources Required Reading:
Read Chapters 7, 8, and 9 in text
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
Read Chapter 3 & 4 in the text
Read Se Yeon Choi, Goo Hyeok Chung, & Jin Nam Choi. (2019).
Why are we having this innovation? Employee attributions of
innovation and implementation behavior. Social Behavior &
Personality: An International Journal, 47(7), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8124
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=pbh&AN=137631636&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Optional Resources:
Read: Chapter 3 & 4 Journal articles
0 points
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Journal Article 3.1:Lucas, J.W. and Baxter, A.R. (2012)
‘Power, influence, and diversity in organizations’, The
ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social
Science, 639(1): 49–70.
Journal Article 3.2:Martinez, A.D., Kane, R.E., Ferris, G.R.
and Brooks, C.D. (2012) ‘Power in leader–follower work
relationships’, Journal of Leadership & Organizational
Studies, 19(2): 142–151.
Journal Article 4.1:Petty, M.M., Beadles, N.A., Chapman,
D.F., Lowery, C.M. and Connell, D.W. (1995) ‘Relationships
between organizational culture and organizational
performance,’ Psychological Reports, 76(2): 483–492.
Journal Article 4.2:Bonavia, T. (2006) ‘Preliminary
organizational culture scale focused on artifacts’,
Psychological Reports, 99(3): 671–674.
Journal Article 4.3:Walker, R.C. and Aritz, J. (2015)
‘Women doing leadership: leadership styles and
organizational culture,’ International Journal of Business
Communication, 52(4): 452–478.
View: Chapter 3 & 4 Videos
Chapter 3: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-3-power-and-leadership
Chapter 4: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-4-culture-and-leadership
Discussion After completing the reading this week, we reflect on a few key
concepts this week:
1. Discuss what power in the context of leadership is and how
it relates to bullying within organizations. Also note how this
impacts productivity.
2. Discuss what organizational culture is and how it impacts
work productivity. Also, note how organizational culture
impacts the success of innovation implementation.
3. How does culture impact leadership? Can culture be seen as
a constraint on leadership?
Please be sure to answer all the questions above in the initial
post.
Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are
substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the
25 points
Initial post
due by
Thursday
Sep. 10,
2020. Two
or more
peers with
substantive
responses
by Sunday,
Sep. 13,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
following:
· Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
· Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful information
· Answer a question posted by another student in detail
· Share an applicable personal experience
· Provide an outside source
· Make an argument
At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in
the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information
from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use
APA references and in-text citations.
Please be sure to engage by Wednesday at 11:59pm ET and then
engage on two more days throughout the week (for a total of
three days of engagement, before Sunday at 11:59pm, ET
Note: This discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is worth
twenty-five (25) points. You are required to respond to the
question in order to obtain credit for the assignment by the due
date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you
will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading
criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be
compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You
will be able to review every other submission once you complete
your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses
will not be tolerated.
Written
Work
This week’s journal article focuses on attribution theory and how
it influences the implementation of innovation technologies. Two
types of employee attributions are noted in the article
(intentionality and deceptive intentionality), please review these
concepts and answer the following questions:
100 points
Due by
Sunday,
Sep. 13,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Provide a high-level overview/ summary of the case study
Note how constructive intentionality impacts innovation
implementations
Find another article that adds to the overall findings of the case
and note how attribution-based perspective enhances successful
innovation implementations. Please be explicit and detailed in
answering this question.
Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google
Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that
journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the
last five years.
The paper should meet the following requirements:
3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references)
APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a cover
page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a
conclusion.
A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.
The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used
to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes
the quality of writing.
Note: This written assignment is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is
one-hundred (100) points. You are required to answer the
questions as stated in the assignment question in order to obtain
credit for the assignment by the due date. If you do not complete
the assignment by the due date, you will receive a zero (0) for
this assignment. There is a grading criterion associated with this
assignment. Your work will be compared to other’s work, using
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
SafeAssign for plagiarism, so please note that copying other
people’s responses will not be tolerated.
Lesson 4: Ethics in Leadership and Knowledge Sharing
Resources Required Reading
Read Chapters 10, and 11 in text
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
Read Chapter 5 in the text
Read LE BA PHONG, LEI HUI, & THAN THANH SON. (2018). How
Leadership and Trust in Leaders Foster Employees’ Behavior
toward Knowledge Sharing. Social Behavior & Personality: An
International Journal, 46(5), 705–720.
https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6711
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=pbh&AN=129468910&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Read CHANHOO SONG, KWANGSEO RYAN PARK, & SEUNG-WAN
KANG. (2015). Servant Leadership and Team Performance: The
Mediating Role of Knowledge-Sharing Climate. Social Behavior &
Personality: An International Journal, 43(10), 1749–1760.
https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.10.1749
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=pbh&AN=111059573&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Optional Resources:
Read: Chapter 5 Journal articles
Journal Article 5.1:Bormann, K.C. and Rowold, J. (2016)
‘Ethical leadership’s potential and boundaries in
0 points
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
organizational change: a moderated mediation model of
employee silence,’ German Journal of Human Resource
Management, 30(3–4): 225–245.
Journal Article 5.2:Haney, A.B., Pope, J. and Arden, Z.
(2018) ‘Making it personal: developing sustainability leaders
in business,’ Organization & Environment. DOI:
10.1177/1086026618806201
View: Chapter 5 Videos
Chapter 5: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-5-ethics-and-leadership
Discussion After completing the reading this week, we reflect on a few key
concepts this week:
1. Discuss what ethical leadership is and how it impacts the
organizational culture.
2. What are the various dimensions of ethical leadership?
3. Note some failures in ethical leadership, please find an
example, explain the failure and note possible solutions to
fix the issue with leadership.
Please be sure to answer all the questions above in the initial
post.
Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are
substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the
following:
· Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
· Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful information
· Answer a question posted by another student in detail
· Share an applicable personal experience
· Provide an outside source
· Make an argument
25 points
Initial post
due by
Thursday
Sep. 17,
2020. Two
or more
peers with
substantive
responses
by Sunday,
Sep. 20,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in
the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information
from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use
APA references and in-text citations.
Please be sure to engage by Wednesday at 11:59pm ET and then
engage on two more days throughout the week (for a total of
three days of engagement, before Sunday at 11:59pm, ET
Note: This discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is worth
twenty-five (25) points. You are required to respond to the
question in order to obtain credit for the assignment by the due
date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you
will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading
criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be
compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You
will be able to review every other submission once you complete
your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses
will not be tolerated.
Written
Work
This week’s journal articles focus on transformational leadership
and knowledge and knowledge sharing within an organization,
please review these concepts and answer the following
questions:
How do trustworthy and ethical leaders enhance knowledge
sharing in organizations? How does this impact the rate of
information technology implementations? How does this impact
data management within organizations?
How does servant leadership assist with transferring knowledge
in an organization?
When thinking about data analytics, how does transformational
leadership assist with building good data structures?
100 points
Due by
Sunday,
Sep. 20,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Midterm
Exam
Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google
Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that
journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the
last five years.
The paper should meet the following requirements:
3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references)
APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a cover
page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a
conclusion.
A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.
The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used
to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes
the quality of writing.
Note: This written assignment is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is
worth one-hundred (100) points. You are required to answer the
questions as stated in the assignment question in order to obtain
credit for the assignment by the due date. If you do not complete
the assignment by the due date, you will receive a zero (0) for
this assignment. There is a grading criterion associated with this
assignment. Your work will be compared to other’s work, using
SafeAssign for plagiarism, so please note that copying other
people’s responses will not be tolerated.
Review Chapters 1 – 11 in text
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
100 points
Due by
Sunday,
Sep. 20,
2020
Lesson 5: Leadership Styles and Tools to Manage Geographically Dispersed Teams
Resources Required Reading:
Read Chapters 12, 13, 14, and 15 in text
0 points
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
Read Chapter’s 6, 7, and 8 in the text
Read (2016). Empowering Leadership and Effective Collaboration
in Geographically Dispersed Teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1),
159–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12108
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=eue&AN=112508299&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Optional Resources:
Read: Chapter 6, 7, & 8 Journal articles
Journal Article 6.1:Russell, R.G. and Mizrahi, R. (1995)
‘Development of a situational model for transformational
leadership,’ Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(3): 154–163.
Journal Article 6.2:Tyssen, A.K., Wald, A. and Spieth, P. (2013)
‘Leadership in temporary organizations: a review of leadership
theories and a research agenda’, ProjectManagement Journal,
44(6): 52–67.
Journal Article 6.3:Greenwood, R.G. (1996) ‘Leadership theory:
a historical look at its evolution’, Journal of Leadership Studies,
3(1): 3–16.
Journal Article 7.1:Chaturvedi, S., Arvey, R.D., Zhang, Z. and
Christoforou, P.T. (2011) ‘Genetic underpinnings of
transformational leadership: The mediating role of dispositional
hope’, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4): 469–
479.
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Journal Article 7.2:Groves, K.S. (2005). ‘Linking leader skills,
follower attitudes, and contextual variables via an integrated
model of charismatic Leadership’, Journal of Management, 31(2):
255–277.
Journal Article 7.3:Heracleous, L. and Klaering, L. A. (2014)
‘Charismatic leadership and rhetorical competence: an analysis of
Steve Jobs’s rhetoric’, Group & Organization Management, 39(2):
131–161.
Journal Article 8.1:Madlock, P.E. (2008). ‘The link between
leadership style, communicator competence, and employee
satisfaction’, The Journal of Business Communication (1973),
45(1): 61–78.
Journal Article 8.2:Carmeli, A., Tishler, A. and Edmondson, A.C.
(2012) ‘CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in
top management teams: the role of team trust and learning from
failure’, Strategic Organization, 10(1): 31–54.
View: Chapter 6 & 7 & 8 Videos
Chapter 6: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-6-trait-behaviour-and-contingency-
theories-of
Chapter 7: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-7-charismatic-and-
transformational-leadership
Chapter 8: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-8-relational-and-distributed-
theories-of-leadership
Discussion After completing the reading this week, we reflect on a few key
concepts this week:
1. Discuss and identify leader traits and attributes that are
most beneficial in implementing the best decisions in an
organization.
25 points
Initial post
due by
Thursday
Sep. 24,
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
2. Explain the differences in charismatic and transformational
leadership and how both leadership styles impact
organizational effectiveness. Please note how these
leadership styles affect implementing new innovative
technologies.
3. Review table 8.1 in the reading this week, note the work
characteristics and the traditional versus high-performance
focus, note which focus is best for strategic decisions and
which is best for operational decisions. Please explain.
Please be sure to answer all the questions above in the initial
post.
Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are
substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the
following:
Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the
topic
Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful
information
Answer a question posted by another student in detail
Share an applicable personal experience
Provide an outside source
Make an argument
At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in
the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information
from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use
APA references and in-text citations.
Please be sure to engage by Wednesday at 11:59pm ET and then
engage on two more days throughout the week (for a total of
three days of engagement, before Sunday at 11:59pm, ET
Note: This discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is worth
twenty-five (25) points. You are required to respond to the
question in order to obtain credit for the assignment by the due
date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you
2020. Two
or more
peers with
substantive
responses
by Sunday,
Sep. 27,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading
criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be
compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You
will be able to review every other submission once you complete
your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses
will not be tolerated.
Written
Work
This week’s journal articles focus on empowering leadership and
effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams, please
answer the following questions:
How do geographically dispersed teams collaborate effectively?
Please find at least three tools on the market that teams can use
to collaborate on a geographically dispersed team. Please note
the pros and cons of each tool.
Based on the research above, note which tool you would select if
you were managing the geographically dispersed team and why.
Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google
Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that
journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the
last five years.
The paper should meet the following requirements:
3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references)
APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a cover
page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a
conclusion.
A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.
The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used
to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes
the quality of writing.
100 points
Due by
Sunday,
Sep. 27,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Note: This written assignment is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is
worth one-hundred (100) points. You are required to answer the
questions as stated in the assignment question in order to obtain
credit for the assignment by the due date. If you do not complete
the assignment by the due date, you will receive a zero (0) for
this assignment. There is a grading criterion associated with this
assignment. Your work will be compared to other’s work, using
SafeAssign for plagiarism, so please note that copying other
people’s responses will not be tolerated.
Lesson 6: Human Resource Management and Digital Retail Case Study
Resources Required Reading:
Read Chapters 16, 17, and 18 in text
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
Read Chapter’s 9 & 10 in the text
Read URBONAVIČIŪTĖ, K., & MAKNICKIENĖ, N. (2019).
Investigation of Digital Retail Companies Financial Performance
Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Science: Future of
Lithuania, 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2019.9737
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=a9h&AN=141392864&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Optional Resources:
Read: Chapter 9 & 10 Journal articles
Journal Article 9.1:Crossman, B. and Crossman, J. (2011)
‘Conceptualising followership – a review of the literature’,
Leadership, 7(4): 481–497.
Journal Article 9.2:Agho, A.O. (2009) ‘Perspectives of
senior-level executives on effective followership and
0 points
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
leadership’, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,
16(2): 159–166.
Journal Article 9.3:Larsson, M. and Nielsen, M.F. (2017)
‘The risky path to a followership identity: from abstract
concept to situated reality’, International Journal of Business
Communication. DOI: 10.1177/23294888417735648, pp. 1–
28.
Journal Article 10.1:Cook, A. and Glass, C. (2015) ‘Do
minority leaders affect corporate practice? Analyzing the
effect of leadership composition on governance and product
development’, Strategic Organization, 13(2): 117–140
Journal Article 10.2:Dreher, G.F. (2003) ‘Breaking the
glass ceiling: the effects of sex ratios and work-life
programs on female leadership at the top’, Human
Relations, 56(5): 541–562.
View: Chapter 9 & 10 Videos
Chapter 9: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-9-hrm-and-leadership
Chapter 10: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-10-talent-management-and-
leadership
Discussion After completing the reading this week, we reflect on a few key
concepts this week:
1. Discuss the key components of human resource
management. Pick at least four concepts from chapter nine
and describe how these concepts interrelate to individual
performance on a team.
2. Review table 9.2 and select one of the dimensions listed,
note why it was chosen and how you relate to this behavior.
If you have a personal experience, please share.
3. How do leaders select the best talent? What are some tools
they can use to select the best-talent?
Please be sure to answer all the questions above in the initial
post.
Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are
substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the
following:
25 points
Initial post
due by
Thursday
Oct. 01,
2020. Two
or more
peers with
substantive
responses
by Sunday,
Oct. 04,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the
topic
Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful
information
Answer a question posted by another student in detail
Share an applicable personal experience
Provide an outside source
Make an argument
At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in
the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information
from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use
APA references and in-text citations.
Please be sure to engage by Wednesday at 11:59pm ET and then
engage on two more days throughout the week (for a total of
three days of engagement, before Sunday at 11:59pm, ET
Note: This discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is worth
twenty-five (25) points. You are required to respond to the
question in order to obtain credit for the assignment by the due
date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you
will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading
criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be
compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You
will be able to review every other submission once you complete
your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses
will not be tolerated.
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Written
Work
At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong
educational programs and courses that allow them to be servant-
leaders in their disciplines and communities, linking research with
practice and knowledge with ethical decision-making. This
assignment is a written assignment where students will
demonstrate how this course research has connected and put
into practice within their own career.
Assignment:
Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double
spaced) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course
have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to
your current work environment. If you are not currently working,
share times when you have or could observe these theories and
knowledge could be applied to an employment opportunity in
your field of study.
Requirements:
Provide a 500 word (or 2 pages double spaced) minimum
reflection.
Use of proper APA formatting and citations. If supporting evidence
from outside resources is used those must be properly cited.
Share a personal connection that identifies specific knowledge
and theories from this course.
Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment. If
you are not employed, demonstrate a connection to your desired
work environment.
You should not, provide an overview of the assignments assigned
in the course. The assignment asks that you reflect how the
knowledge and skills obtained through meeting course objectives
were applied or could be applied in the workplace.
Don’t forget that the grade also includes the quality of writing.
200 points
Due by
Sunday Oct.
04, 2020
Lesson 7: Performance Management and the Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Resources
Required Reading:
Read Chapters 19, 20, and 21 in text
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
Read Chapter’s 11 & 12 in the text
Read HAO MENG, ZHI-CHAO CHENG, & TIAN-CHAO GUO. (2016).
Positive Team Atmosphere Mediates the Impact of Authentic
Leadership on Subordinate Creativity. Social Behavior &
Personality: An International Journal, 44(3), 355–368.
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=s3h&AN=114485096&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Read Brock, J. K.-U., & von Wangenheim, F. (2019). Demystifying
AI: What Digital Transformation Leaders Can Teach You about
Realistic Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review,
61(4), 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219865226
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=buh&AN=138097013&site=eds-
live&custid=s8501869&groupid=main&profile=eds_new
Optional Resources:
Read: Chapter 11 & 12 Journal articles
Journal Article 11.1:Budhwar, P.S. (2000) ‘A reappraisal of
HRM models in Britain’, Journal of General Management,
26(2): 72–91
Journal Article 11.2:Vermeeren, B., Kuipers, B. and Steijn,
B. (2014) ‘Does leadership style make a difference? Linking
HRM, job satisfaction, and organizational performance’,
Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2): 174–195.
0
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Journal Article 12.1:Swailes, S. (2016) ‘The cultural
evolution of talent management: a memetic analysis’,
Human Resource Development Review, 15(3): 340–358.
Journal Article 12.2:Kim, S. and McLean, G. N. (2012)
‘Global talent management: necessity, challenges, and the
roles of HRD’, Advances in Developing Human Resources,
14(4): 566–585.
View: Chapter 11 &12 Videos
Chapter 11: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-11-performance-
management-and-leadership
Chapter 12: https://study.sagepub.com/bratton/student-
resources/sage-video/chapter-12-leadership-development
Discussion After completing the reading this week, we reflect on a few key
concepts this week:
1. Discuss what performance management is and how it
influences effective teams.
2. Review table 11.1, define leadership behaviors (in your own
words) and note which behaviors are beneficial at specific
organizational activities (example: project planning, leading
coworkers, etc…). Please note at least five organizational
activities and be specific when responding.
3. Note at least two organizational capabilities and compare
and contrast each.
Please be sure to answer all the questions above in the initial
post.
Please ensure the initial post and two response posts are
substantive. Substantive posts will do at least TWO of the
following:
· Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
· Expand on the topic, by adding additional thoughtful information
· Answer a question posted by another student in detail
· Share an applicable personal experience
25 points
Initial post
due by
Thursday
Oct. 08,
2020. Two
or more
peers with
substantive
responses
by Sunday,
Oct. 11,
2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
· Provide an outside source
· Make an argument
At least one scholarly (peer-reviewed) resource should be used in
the initial discussion thread. Please ensure to use information
from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use
APA references and in-text citations.
Please be sure to engage by Wednesday at 11:59pm ET and then
engage on two more days throughout the week (for a total of
three days of engagement, before Sunday at 11:59pm, ET
Note: This discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is worth
twenty-five (25) points. You are required to respond to the
question in order to obtain credit for the assignment by the due
date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you
will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading
criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be
compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You
will be able to review every other submission once you complete
your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses
will not be tolerated.
Written
Work
This week’s journal article focus on the how positive team culture
can correct the impact of lagging leadership creativity.
Additionally, we discussed how digital transformation leaders in
regard to artificial intelligence (AI). After reviewing the reading,
please answer the following questions:
1. What is your definition of AI? Please explain.
2. What is your opinion of AI, is the technology currently
available? Why or why not?
3. Please note at least four AI technologies, explain if they are
truly AI or something else. Thoroughly explain your answer.
4. How is AI perceived as different in various industries and
locations? Please explain.
100 points
Due by
Sunday, Oct
11, 2020
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Portfolio
Project/
Course
Project
Be sure to use the UC Library for scholarly research. Google
Scholar is also a great source for research. Please be sure that
journal articles are peer-reviewed and are published within the
last five years.
The paper should meet the following requirements:
· 3-5 pages in length (not including title page or references)
· APA guidelines must be followed. The paper must include a
cover page, an introduction, a body with fully developed content,
and a conclusion.
· A minimum of five peer-reviewed journal articles.
The writing should be clear and concise. Headings should be used
to transition thoughts. Don’t forget that the grade also includes
the quality of writing.
Note: This written assignment is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is
worth one-hundred (100) points. You are required to answer the
questions as stated in the assignment question in order to obtain
credit for the assignment by the due date. If you do not complete
the assignment by the due date, you will receive a zero (0) for
this assignment. There is a grading criterion associated with this
assignment. Your work will be compared to other’s work, using
SafeAssign for plagiarism, so please note that copying other
people’s responses will not be tolerated.
Portfolio Project/ Course Project: 15 – 20 PowerPoint Presentation
slides and 10 – 12 pages Project Research Documentation APA
format.
100 points
Due by
Sunday, Oct
11, 2020
Lesson 8: Reflection Weeks
Resources NA 0 points
Grading
Category Activity Title
Grade
Allocation
(% of all
graded
work)
Discussion
Final Exam
This is a shortened week and therefore we are going to complete
a reflection activity.
This discussion topic is to be reflective of the course material.
Therefore, use your own words to respond to the following
questions:
1. What other topics would you have liked to have covered in
this course?
2. What reading did you find most interesting and why?
3. How has this course changed your perspective or outlook
moving forward?
4. Any other topic of interest that you would like to add.
5. Please be sure to answer all the questions above in the
initial post.
6. Please be sure to engage by Wednesday at 5pm ET
Note: This discussion is a REQUIRED ASSIGNMENT it is worth
twenty-five (25) points. You are required to respond to the
question in order to obtain credit for the assignment by the due
date. If you do not respond to the question by the due date, you
will receive a zero (0) for this assignment. There is a grading
criterion associated with this assignment. Your work will be
compared against your peers using SafeAssign for plagiarism. You
will be able to review every other submission once you complete
your entry, so please note that copying other people’s responses
will not be tolerated.
Read Chapters 1 – 21 in text
IT Strategy: Issues and practices, McKeen, J. D., & Smith, H. A.,
Pearson, 2015, Third Edition
ALL WORK IS DUE BY WEDNESDAY at 5pm THIS WEEK!
25 points
Due by
Wednesday,
Oct. 14,
2020
100 points
Final Exam
Due by
Wednesday
Oct 14,
2020
Syllabus Disclaimer
This syllabus contains important information critical to your success in this course. It
includes guidelines for this course and the instructor’s current expectations about content,
schedule, and requirements necessary for each student to achieve the best educational
results. While you must review and become familiar with the contents of this syllabus, the
instructor reserves the right to make adjustments or change in the syllabus from time to
time. Any changes to the syllabus will be discussed with the students.