Form 1009W
Written Communication Assessment
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Failed Unsatisfactory Marginal Developing Proficient Exemplary
Introduction 0 Points
Missing thesis.
2 Points
Weak thesis
4 Points
Thesis is not focused or relevant to the writer’s purpose.
6 Points
Thesis is partially focused or relevant to the writer’s purpose.
8 Points
Thesis is sufficiently stated and focused.
10 Points
Thesis is clearly stated, focused, and specific.
Development- Research & Support
0 Points
Major points and research do not support thesis. Failed to identify relevant sources.
2 Points
Major points and research offer weak support for thesis or are poorly developed. Insufficient source materials identified.
4 Points
Major points and research partially support thesis. Referenced minimal partially relevant sources.
6 Points
Major points and research sufficiently support thesis. Retrieved sufficient source materials.
8 Points
Major points and research fully support thesis. Identified a variety of relevant sources.
10 Points
Major and minor points and research fully support thesis throughout. Identified and critically evaluated relevant sources.
Development- Points of View
0 Points
Fails to consider any other points of view.
2 Points
Mentions one additional point of view.
4 Points
Presents other points of view but does not reason through them.
6 Points
Presents other points of view and partially reasons through them.
8 Points
Discusses multiple points of view.
10 Points
Thoroughly introduces and discusses multiple points of view.
Development- Sequencing
0 Points
No rational sequencing of major/minor points.
2 Points
Sequencing of major/minor points confuses writer’s purpose.
4 Points
Sequencing of major/minor points displays weak support for writer’s purpose.
6 Points
Sequencing of major/minor points partially supports writer’s purpose.
8 Points
Sequencing of major/minor points effectively supports writer’s purpose.
10 Points
Superb sequencing of major/minor points thoroughly supports writer’s purpose.
Development- Analysis
0 Points
Fails to show how evidence supports main points/thesis.
2 Points
Minimal analysis to link evidence to main points/thesis.
4 Points
Partial analysis of evidence to show how it supports main points/thesis.
6 Points
Some analysis of evidence to show how it supports main points/thesis.
8 Points
Clear reasoning that sufficiently ties supporting evidence to main points/thesis.
10 Points
Clear and thorough reasoning that shows how evidence supports main points/thesis.
Development- Transitions/Flow
0 Points
No transitions.
2 Points
Weak transitions throughout disrupt flow.
4 Points
Several transitions are weak or unclear.
6 Points
Transitions are mostly sufficient to maintain flow.
8 Points
Transitions effectively connect major/minor points.
10 Points
Smooth transitions throughout enhance readability.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Page 1 of 2
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Failed Unsatisfactory Marginal Developing Proficient Exemplary
Conclusion 0 Points
No conclusion.
2 Points
Conclusion Does not support the thesis, is disconnected from the evidence and reasoning, and/or introduces new ideas.
4 Points
Conclusion shows little support for thesis, is not sufficiently linked to the evidence and lacks reasoning.
6 Points
Conclusion partially supports thesis, is not strongly linked to the evidence.
8 Points
Conclusion is primarily clear and sufficiently reinforces thesis and major parts, and is mostly justified by the evidence.
10 Points
Conclusion is clear and reinforces thesis and major parts, and is fully justified by the evidence.
Style 0 Points
Numerous wordy, vague or irrelevant sentences. 15 or more instances of passive voice.
2 Points
Several wordy, vague or irrelevant sentences. 11- 14 instances of passive voice.
4 Points
Some sentences or paragraphs are vague. 7-10 instances of passive voice.
6 Points
Primarily clear, concise sentences and paragraphs. 4-6 instances of passive voice.
8 Points
Clear, concise sentences and paragraphs. No more than 3 instances of passive voice.
10 Points
Clear, concise sentences and paragraphs written in active voice.
Grammar 0 Points
15 or more grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
2 Points
11-14 grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
4 Points
7-10 grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
6 Points
4-6 grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
8 Points
No more than 3 grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
10 Points
No grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
APA Format 0 Points
15 or more APA format errors.
2 Points
11-14 APA format errors.
4 Points
7-10 APA format errors.
6 Points
4-6 APA format errors.
8 Points
No more than 3 APA format errors.
10 Points
No APA format errors.
Plagiarism and Direct Quotes
-31 Points
ANY plagiarism or more than 25% of essay consists of direct quotes (word count).
-10 Points
Essay consists of 16-25% direct quotes (based on word count).
0 Points
No plagiarism or excessive use of direct quotes.
0 Points
No plagiarism or excessive use of direct quotes.
0 Points
No plagiarism or excessive use of direct quotes.
0 Points
No plagiarism or excessive use of direct quotes.
Assignment Requirements
-20 Points
Essay does not meet the assignment length requirement AND was submitted after the due date.
-10 Points
Essay does not meet the assignment length requirement.
-10 Points
Essay submitted after the assignment due date.
-10 Points
Essay does not meet more than one requirement identified in the assignment instructions.
-5 Points
Essay does not meet one requirement identified in the assignment instructions.
0 Points
Met all assignment requirements.
Page 2 of 2
Instructions
Haines Research Paper:
The Haines Research Paper is an argumentative paper. The paper must be debatable and must supply other perspectives that are opposite of your opinion. An argumentative research paper consists of an introduction in which the writer clearly introduces the topic and informs the audience exactly which stance the writer intends to take; this stance is often identified as the thesis statement.
The purpose of this assignment is to have students focus on a problem or issue, make a logical argument, and assert a position. During your research, you will not simply describe a topic, but critically give thoughts and opinions about it, while drawing on ideas and theories from others in the field who have written about the topic.
Assignment Instructions:
Write a 4 – 5-page paper (no more than 5 pages), with a minimum four level one headings to include the Conclusion, and a minimum of six references, to include peer reviews. Incorporate peer review feedback into paper as appropriate.
(Note: Based upon the approved topic, thesis statement, and outline, this paper will have five level one headings, including the Conclusion).
Haines Research Paper Outline
TOPIC: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
NARROWED TOPIC: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among U.S. Military personnel
TITLE: Causes and Impact of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
THESIS: Despite the U.S. government measures to reduce Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) cases, combat exposure is still a leading cause of the development of PTSD among U.S. military personnel, including active-duty service members and veterans.
I. Causes and Impact of Post-Traumatic Disorder
II. Prevalence of PTSD in the U.S. Military
A. Vietnam Veterans
B. Persian Gulf War Veterans
C. Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans
III. The Signs of PTSD
A. Constant Mood Swings
B. Avoidance
C. Extreme Physical Reaction
D. Detachment from the Family and Friends
E. Poor Personal Relations
IV. PTSD Risk Factors
A. Traumatic Events
B. Lack of Support
C. Genetic Factors
D. Previous Trauma
V. Preventive Measures
A. Service-wide Interventions
B. Interventions for Individuals exposed to Trauma
1. Brief Early Interventions
2. Psychologic Debriefing
3. Pharmacotherapy
VI. Conclusion
