Describe a health care barrier or issue that needs to be addressed.

The capstone project is designed to be completed in sections. This is part one of the assignment.

Propose a topic for your change proposal (1,000-1,250 words).

If you are having trouble with your topic, please contact your instructor for assistance.

Use the feedback you have received on your proposed topics in the Main Forum and the availability of evidence in peer-reviewed nursing and medical journals to support your intervention and choose a viable topic.

Based on your logic model, present a brief summary of the health care barrier or issue presented. Include the following:

Describe a health care barrier or issue that needs to be addressed.
Describe your proposed solution and how the proposed solution will resolve a barrier or issue in health care.
Justify major organizational resources that may be needed to accomplish changes.
Identify strategies to create a clear vision for internal and external stakeholders.
Identify stakeholders with expertise to create effective work groups or collaborators.
Discuss the expected outcomes for you initiating your proposal.

This assignment requires you to support your position by referencing four to six scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from peer-reviewed resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HLT-494	HLT-494-O101	Part I: Change Proposal Topic	100.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%)	Satisfactory (75.00%)	Good (85.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Topic for Change Proposal	10.0%	The description of a topic for a change proposal is not present.	The description of a topic for a change proposal is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of a topic for a change proposal is present.	The description of a topic for a change proposal is detailed.	The description of a topic for a change proposal is thorough.
Description of Health Care Barrier	10.0%	The description of a health care barrier is not present.	The description of a health care barrier is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of a health care barrier is present.	The description of a health care barrier is detailed.	e description of a health care barrier is thorough.
Proposed Solution and How It Will Resolve a Barrier	10.0%	The description of a proposed solution and how it will resolve a barrier is not present.	The description of a proposed solution and how it will resolve a barrier is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of a proposed solution and how it will resolve a barrier is present.	The description of a proposed solution and how it will resolve a barrier is detailed.	The description of a proposed solution and how it will resolve a barrier is thorough.
Justification for Major Organizational Resources Needed to Accomplish Change	10.0%	The justification for major organizational resources needed to accomplish change is not present.	The justification for major organizational resources needed to accomplish change is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The justification for major organizational resources needed to accomplish change is present.	The justification for major organizational resources needed to accomplish change is detailed.	The justification for major organizational resources needed to accomplish change is thorough.
Description of Strategies to Create a Vision for Internal and External Stakeholders	10.0%	The description of strategies to create a vision for internal and external stakeholders is not present.	The description of strategies to create a vision for internal and external stakeholders is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of strategies to create a vision for internal and external stakeholders is present.	The description of strategies to create a vision for internal and external stakeholders is detailed.	The description of strategies to create a vision for internal and external stakeholders is thorough.
Description of Stakeholders With Expertise	10.0%	The description of stakeholders with expertise is not present.	The description of stakeholders with expertise is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of stakeholders with expertise is present.	The description of stakeholders with expertise is detailed.	The description of stakeholders with expertise is thorough.
Expected Outcomes for Initiating the Proposal	10.0%	The description of expected outcomes for initiating the proposal is not present.	The description of expected outcomes for initiating the proposal is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of expected outcomes for initiating the proposal is present.	The description of expected outcomes for initiating the proposal is detailed.	The description of expected outcomes for initiating the proposal is thorough.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Describe a health care barrier or issue that needs to be addressed.

Rubic_Print_Format

Related posts

Select at least one student to whom you will administer the informal RTI assessment created in Clinical Field Experience A. Score the assessment and share the results with the student to increase understanding of his or her strengths and areas for improvement.

Examples of nonbiased formal and informal specialized diagnostic assessments that are administered to the students being evaluated, including any legal and ethical requirements.